Xognosis EsotericaArcane Publishing StudioFor roughly seventeen centuries, if you wanted to know what the Gnostics taught, you had to ask the people who wanted them destroyed. Nearly everything the West believed about Valentinus, Marcion, Basilides, and their heirs came from prosecutors, not practitioners. The refutations survived; the accused left almost nothing.
Share
For roughly seventeen centuries, if you wanted to know what the Gnostics taught, you had to ask the people who wanted them destroyed. Nearly everything the West believed about Valentinus, Marcion, Basilides, and their heirs came from prosecutors, not practitioners. The refutations survived; the accused left almost nothing. Then, within a single human lifetime, two bundles of papyrus surfaced in Egypt, and the defendants finally began to speak.
Sometime between 174 and 189 CE, probably around 180, Irenaeus, bishop of Lyons, sat down to write a five-book demolition of his Christian rivals. The work we now call Against Heresies targeted the Valentinians first, then Marcion, Basilides, Simon Magus, Carpocrates, and a longer roster of sects, all charged with corrupting the faith from within.
Irenaeus is our problem and our benefactor at once. Because his opponents' own libraries perished, his hostile summaries became, by default, the primary record of what they believed. He describes the Valentinian system of thirty Aeons, divine emanations unfolding from the supreme Father in male and female pairs. "Such are the thirty AEons in the erroneous system of these men," he concludes, with the satisfaction of a man ticking off an inventory. Elsewhere he concedes the ingenuity of their scriptural method before condemning it: "they proceed when they find anything in the multitude of things contained in the Scriptures which they can adopt and accommodate to their baseless speculations."
Read as evidence, these passages tell us what a rival bishop around 180 claimed the Valentinians taught. Read as history, they are one side's interpretation of writings that have otherwise mostly vanished. Fact: Irenaeus wrote these refutations, and they say what they say. Interpretation: what practitioners actually believed in their own assemblies. The two categories collapsed into one for seventeen centuries, because only one side's paperwork survived.
Nearly two hundred years later the project was renewed on a grander scale. Epiphanius, bishop of Salamis on Cyprus, wrote his Panarion between 374 and 377. The title means medicine chest, stocked against the bites of heresy. Encyclopaedia Britannica calls the work "an account of 80 heresies and their refutations, which ends with a statement of orthodox doctrine."
Eighty is not a neutral count. Epiphanius built his number on an allegorical reading of the Song of Songs, in which Solomon's eighty concubines stood for the eighty sects of error. The catalogue's very shape was driven by biblical symbolism, a numerological frame rather than a census. He also had Irenaeus on his desk and borrowed freely, so the Panarion is partly a copy of a copy of hostility: second-hand prosecution, filed under a verse.
From Irenaeus through Epiphanius, and with Hippolytus and Tertullian in between, the anti-heretical tradition became the archive. Medieval and early modern scholars, Protestant and Catholic alike, inherited the whole picture from these men. There was no way to check their summaries, because there was nothing to check them against.
A small crack appeared in 1785, when the British Museum bought the Askew Codex from the heirs of Dr. Anthony Askew. This Coptic manuscript, containing the Pistis Sophia, was the first Gnostic text to reach Western scholarship. It was poorly understood at the time, and it stood alone, so the heresiologists' version of events remained the standard account.
In January 1896 the German dealer Carl Reinhardt bought a papyrus codex in Cairo, reportedly found near Akhmim. The manuscript, now known as the Berlin Codex (Papyrus Berolinensis 8502), reached the attention of the scholarly world when Carl Schmidt presented it to the Royal Prussian Academy in Berlin on 16 July 1896. It was a fourth- or fifth-century Coptic codex containing the Gospel of Mary, the Apocryphon of John, the Sophia of Jesus Christ, and an epitome of the Act of Peter.
Here for the first time, texts the heresiologists had described began to survive in their own words. The Apocryphon of John, in particular, was a text Irenaeus had summarized and attacked. Now scholars could set his account beside something the other side might actually have read. Recognition came slowly; the contents were not completely translated until 1955, and the Gospel of Mary survives only in pieces. The find-spot story, a wall niche wrapped in feathers near Akhmim, comes through the dealer and Schmidt rather than controlled excavation, so it should be held as probable rather than proven.
Still, the direction of evidence had reversed. Where the new texts overlapped with the old refutations, they sometimes confirmed the heresiologists' outlines, and sometimes complicated them badly.
The second discovery needed no dealer's careful provenance to become legend, though its own story resists verification too. In December 1945 a farmer named Muhammad 'Ali al-Samman, digging for fertilizer near Jabal al-Tarif close to Nag Hammadi in Upper Egypt, uncovered a sealed earthenware jar. Inside were twelve leather-bound papyrus codices, plus leaves of a thirteenth, holding fifty-two mostly Gnostic treatises in Coptic. The Claremont Colleges archive, which now documents the find, describes the manuscripts as "hidden in an earthenware jar for 1,600 years."
Some leaves were burned, the family later said, by the discoverer's mother feeding an oven. The jinn said to guard the jar belongs to the story as told, not to the archaeology. The whole narrative, jar, jinn, burning, and the blood feud around it, rests on later interviews with the discoverer compiled by scholars, and those interviews shifted between tellings; the early investigator Jean Doresse recorded none of these details. Treat it as the received account. The codices are fact; their journey is narrative.
What the jar contained is beyond dispute: a library. The codices are generally dated to the fourth century, and many of the texts are Greek compositions translated into Coptic, works known previously only through the distortions of men like Irenaeus and Epiphanius. After years in private hands and the upheavals surrounding the 1952 revolution, the codices reached the Coptic Museum in Cairo. Full scholarly access took decades more, tangled in politics and possession.
In 1977 James M. Robinson's English edition, The Nag Hammadi Library in English, made the whole corpus widely readable, thirty-two years after the find. The accused finally had their testimony on the public record, and the picture that emerged was stranger and more various than the prosecutors had allowed. There was no single Gnosticism. The codices held many currents: some devotional, some philosophical, some argumentative in ways Irenaeus would have recognized as kin to his own methods.
For seventeen centuries the history of the Gnostics was written by their enemies, and the enemies were the only witnesses heard. The Berlin Codex and the Nag Hammadi library did not settle the case; they ended the trial by finally admitting the defense's evidence.
The heresiologists remain valuable. Their catalogs preserve names, dates, and teachings that would otherwise be wholly lost, and their hostility is itself historical evidence worth studying. What changed in 1896 and 1945 is that they lost their monopoly. Anyone wanting to weigh the original arguments, both the accusations and the accused's own words, can now do so; our own primer, Gnosticism Explained, is one place to start. The lesson generalizes past antiquity: when only one side's documents survive, ask who kept the archive, and why.
Read the book
Related Articles
Continue through articles sharing this topic.
Esoteric literature has a way of swallowing beginners whole. You pick up one book about alchemy, and within a week you have six tabs open about Renaissance…
7 min read
In January 1896 the German scholar Carl Reinhardt bought a Coptic papyrus codex in Cairo.
7 min read
Every few decades, someone translates the esoteric classics again. New Enoches appear. New Pistis Sophias.
6 min read
Pick a shelf of spiritual books at random and you will find, somewhere in the first twenty pages, the same accusation: you are not actually awake.
7 min read
Related Books
Catalog volumes sharing this article’s lead tag.