Xognosis EsotericaArcane Publishing StudioIn January 1896 the German scholar Carl Reinhardt bought a Coptic papyrus codex in Cairo. According to the account he gave, it had been found near Akhmim, hidden in a niche in a wall and wrapped in feathers. That detail belongs to a purchase story, not to a controlled excavation, so hold it loosely.
Share
In January 1896 the German scholar Carl Reinhardt bought a Coptic papyrus codex in Cairo. According to the account he gave, it had been found near Akhmim, hidden in a niche in a wall and wrapped in feathers. That detail belongs to a purchase story, not to a controlled excavation, so hold it loosely. The codex itself is solid fact: manuscript BG 8502, better known as the Berlin Codex, a single-quire papyrus book copied in Sahidic Coptic in the late fourth or early fifth century. Reinhardt could not have known it, but he had just bought two of the most consequential Christian apocrypha ever recovered, bound together in one cover: the Gospel of Mary and the Apocryphon of John.
The Berlin Codex contains four works in sequence: the Gospel of Mary, the Apocryphon of John, the Wisdom (Sophia) of Jesus Christ, and an epitome of the Act of Peter. That combination matters. The two texts at the center of this article, Mary and the Apocryphon, traveled together physically. Whoever commissioned the codex around the year 400 wanted a small library of what we now call gnostic Christian literature in one portable volume.
A disambiguation is needed here, because popular accounts routinely get it wrong. The Berlin Codex is not the manuscript that contains the Pistis Sophia. That text survives in the Askew Codex, a parchment manuscript discovered in 1773 and bought by the British Museum in 1785 from the collector Anthony Askew. Different find, different century, different country, different library. The two codices are confused so often that the error has become almost a tradition in itself. The Sophia of Jesus Christ inside the Berlin Codex is also a distinct text from the Pistis Sophia, which compounds the muddle.
The Gospel of Mary occupies, by the usual reconstruction, nineteen pages of the codex. Only pages 7 to 10 and 15 to 19 survive, meaning less than half the text is preserved. The pages between are simply gone, and anything claimed about their contents is reconstruction rather than report. Two third-century Greek fragments, P. Oxy. 3525 and P. Ryl. 463, confirm that the Coptic is a translation from a Greek original composed no later than the third century, probably in the second. Scholarly convention identifies the Mary of the title as Mary Magdalene; the text itself says only "Mary."
What survives is a dialogue framed by loss. The extant text opens mid-conversation, with a disciple asking whether matter will be destroyed, and the Savior answering (in the older gnosis.org rendering): "All nature, all formations, all creatures exist in and with one another, and they will be resolved again into their own roots." After the Savior departs, the disciples grieve and weep. Mary stands and steadies them. Peter says to her: "Sister we know that the Savior loved you more than the rest of woman. Tell us the words of the Savior which you remember which you know, but we do not, nor have we heard them." She answers: "What is hidden from you I will proclaim to you."
What follows, on the missing pages, we do not have. When the text returns, Mary is finishing a vision of the soul's ascent past hostile powers. The reaction is not gratitude. Peter challenges her: "Did He really speak privately with a woman and not openly to us? Are we to turn about and all listen to her? Did He prefer her to us?" Levi rebukes him: "Peter you have always been hot tempered. Now I see you contending against the woman like the adversaries. But if the Savior made her worthy, who are you indeed to reject her?" A few lines later the manuscript gives out; the last surviving words report the disciples going out "to proclaim and to preach."
The Apocryphon of John follows in the same codex, occupying pages 19 through 77. It is a different kind of writing entirely: a long revelation discourse in which the risen Christ answers John the son of Zebedee's questions about how the world came to be, how evil entered it, and how souls can escape it. Its opening announces itself as "the teaching of the saviour, and the revelation of the mysteries and the things hidden in silence, even these things which he taught John, his disciple." The attribution to John the Apostle is pseudepigraphy, the consensus view: a second-century Greek author wrote in the apostle's voice.
That date is not guesswork. Around 180 CE, Irenaeus of Lyon summarized a gnostic myth in Against Heresies book 1, chapter 29, that matches the Apocryphon closely enough that scholars use it to fix the work's composition before about 180. The Berlin copy is a Coptic translation made centuries later, and it is not alone. The 1945 discovery of the Nag Hammadi library produced three more Coptic copies (Nag Hammadi Codices II, III, and IV), giving the Apocryphon four surviving manuscripts. That is an unusually rich attestation for a "lost" gospel. The copies divide into a long recension and a short recension, with the Berlin witness among the short.
Whether the text is properly called "Sethian gnostic," and exactly how it relates to what Irenaeus was attacking, are scholarly classifications rather than settled facts. The myth itself is intricate: a transcendent unknown Father, a fall within the divine fullness, a misguided creator, and a spark of the divine imprisoned in human bodies. For a fuller walkthrough of that mythology and its context, our book Gnosticism Explained covers the terrain in detail.
The codex's modern afterlife was nearly as unlucky as its burial. Carl Schmidt brought it to the attention of the Royal Prussian Academy of Sciences on 16 July 1896, and editions began to appear: the Act of Peter in 1903, work on the Apocryphon from 1907. Then, around 1912, a broken pipe flooded the printing house and destroyed the whole printed run of Schmidt's nearly finished Apocryphon edition. The gnostic contents of the codex were not fully published in translation until Walter Till's edition of 1955, nearly six decades after Reinhardt's purchase. One of the great manuscript finds of the nineteenth century effectively sat out the first half of the twentieth.
Bound in the same codex, the two books complement each other. The Apocryphon of John gives the cosmology: where the world came from and why it traps the soul. The Gospel of Mary gives the consequence: an individual soul, warned and instructed, making the ascent alone while the community argues about whether a woman should be the one reporting it. The codex's ancient compiler perhaps saw them as myth and application, doctrine and drama.
Honesty requires saying what the texts are not. There is no evidence the Gospel of Mary was suppressed by a coordinated campaign, and no basis for the popular fiction that makes Mary Magdalene Jesus's wife. What the fragment does show, plainly, is a second-century Christian community in which authority could be contested along the lines of who heard the teaching and who got to repeat it. That is interesting enough without invention.
The Berlin Codex preserved two books in one cover: a myth of how the soul fell, and a scene of the soul rising while the apostles argue about the messenger. Less than half of the Gospel of Mary survives, and the Apocryphon of John nearly vanished twice, first into the Egyptian ground and then into a flooded print shop. What reached us arrived by luck, and reading it well means keeping track of what is fact, what is interpretation, and what is marketing.
For readers who want the fragments in full, with the gaps marked and the scholarship surveyed, our edition of The Gospel of Mary is built for exactly that.
Read the book
Related Articles
Continue through articles sharing this topic.
Esoteric literature has a way of swallowing beginners whole. You pick up one book about alchemy, and within a week you have six tabs open about Renaissance…
7 min read
Every few decades, someone translates the esoteric classics again. New Enoches appear. New Pistis Sophias.
6 min read
Pick a shelf of spiritual books at random and you will find, somewhere in the first twenty pages, the same accusation: you are not actually awake.
7 min read
For roughly seventeen centuries, if you wanted to know what the Gnostics taught, you had to ask the people who wanted them destroyed.
6 min read
Related Books
Catalog volumes sharing this article’s lead tag.