Xognosis EsotericaArcane Publishing StudioIn December 1945, an Arab peasant made an astonishing archaeological discovery in Upper Egypt. Or perhaps it was a few weeks earlier, and perhaps there were two peasants, or seven, or eight. The jar was sixty centimeters tall, or almost a meter, or, in some retellings, six feet.
Share
In December 1945, an Arab peasant made an astonishing archaeological discovery in Upper Egypt. Or perhaps it was a few weeks earlier, and perhaps there were two peasants, or seven, or eight. The jar was sixty centimeters tall, or almost a meter, or, in some retellings, six feet. The books inside were thirteen in number, except that the count has quietly dissolved under scrutiny. Nearly everything the public knows about the find at Nag Hammadi comes from a story assembled thirty years after the event, and it has been growing and shedding detail ever since. What follows is an audit: what the documents support, what rests on one scholar's reconstruction, and what deserves to be called legend.
The codices themselves are beyond dispute. Twelve surviving volumes plus eight loose leaves of a thirteenth, tucked inside Codex VI, some fifty-two texts in all, were found in Upper Egypt around 1945. Paleography dates the copies to the middle of the fourth century. They reached Cairo through the antiquities trade, were declared Egyptian national property, and are now held in the Coptic Museum. There the agreement ends.
The popular version descends from James M. Robinson, the Claremont scholar who tracked the story down in the 1970s, and from Elaine Pagels, whose 1979 bestseller fixed it for a mass audience. In Pagels's telling, the peasant Muhammad 'Ali and his brothers, out digging for fertilizer, hit "a red earthenware jar, almost a meter high"; he hesitated because "a jinn, or spirit, might live inside", then smashed it with his mattock and found thirteen papyrus books bound in leather. His mother, she wrote, later "burned much of the papyrus in the oven along with the straw".
Robinson's own written accounts disagree on basic points. In 1977 he described two people at the find. In 1979 it was seven, with the youngest brother unearthing the jar. By 1981, eight. And when Muhammad 'Ali appeared on camera in the 1987 Channel 4 documentary The Gnostics, he said he had been alone: "I smashed the pot on my own and inside I found these old books." No independent record names the finder. Peasants of the al-Samman family, from the Hamra Dun area near the Jabal al-Tarif cliff, found the jar; the precise roster is unrecoverable.
Even the jar grew: "60 cm or more in height" in Robinson's interview reports, "almost a meter" in Pagels, six feet in later accounts. The jar itself was destroyed at the find spot. Mark Goodacre, whose 2013 study is the fullest audit of all this, calls it the mystery of the growing jar.
The familiar date, December 1945, is not documented directly. Robinson deduced it. "The date of the discovery of the Nag Hammadi codices can be established by two murders," he wrote in 1979, reasoning backward from the chronology of a village feud. Muhammad 'Ali had told him that he and his brothers avenged their father's death by killing Ahmad Isma'il, and, in Robinson's printed words, "they cut out his heart and consumed it among them - the ultimate act of blood revenge". 'Ali repeated the story on camera in 1987: "with my knife I cut out his heart and ate it."
The French scholar Jean Doresse, who investigated Upper Egypt between 1947 and 1950, could establish only "about 1945". His informants, villagers who did not know what he was looking for, told him spontaneously that peasants hunting for manure had found "a great zir - which means jar - filled with leaves of papyrus". Doresse had heard the murder story too and had not thought it credible enough to publish. That December survives as the conventional date is a case study in how a reconstruction hardens into fact.
Here the audit turns uncomfortable. Robinson gathered his details in the mid-1970s, decades after the event, from villagers who stood to gain. His own description of the method: "Whenever I went down, I would bring the villagers a bottle of whiskey and a ten-pound note. That was big money at the time... I went from rumor to rumor, village to village."
His colleagues objected. Rodolphe Kasser scorned interviews conducted "in full force, accompanied by Egyptian notables, promising compensation to his informants", warning about "the fabricating capabilities of the Egyptian fellahin lured by the prospect of gain", and asking whether "a small event of minimal importance for the local population could be remembered in such detail so many years after the fact". In 1984, in the introduction to the Brill Facsimile Edition, Kasser and Martin Krause printed a formal disclaimer. They accepted only "the core of the story (the general location and approximate date of the discovery)", dismissing the rest as "stories and fables that one can collect in popular Egyptian circles thirty years after an event". Robinson fired back that his investigation "is what history is made of, not fable".
He eventually conceded the central count. Muhammad 'Ali, he wrote in 2007, "had heard me and others talk of thirteen codices, and so he would quite naturally speak of thirteen, not recalling what he had counted at the time (if he had counted at all - he was illiterate)". The "thirteenth codex" is those eight leaves inside Codex VI. No lost codex ever existed.
The trail from the cliff to Cairo runs through a priest, a schoolteacher, a physician, an outlaw, and a chain of dealers. Robinson reconstructed it from interviews and records: Basiliyus 'Abd al-Masih, Raghib Andrawus, George Sobhi, then Bahij 'Ali, Dhaki Basta, the Cypriot dealer Phokion Tano, and the Belgian Albert Eid. The endpoints are documented where the middle is not. By Robinson's account, the Coptic Museum registered its first codex on 4 October 1946, and after Egypt's 1952 revolution the state moved to keep the Tano holdings in the country as national property.
The cleanest documented episode is the fate of Codex I. On Robinson's reconstruction, Eid had offered it in New York and Ann Arbor in 1949 without finding a buyer. On 10 May 1952 the C. G. Jung Institute of Zurich bought it for 35,000 Swiss francs, the money supplied by the American patron George H. Page. At a public ceremony on 15 November 1953 the Institute's director, C. A. Meier, "baptized" it the Jung Codex. Jung himself disliked the idea: in a letter to Meier written a few weeks beforehand, he said the thought of the codex bearing his name had never sat right with him, and that he wanted no place at the center of a celebration. The papyrus then sat in a Zurich bank vault while its editio princeps appeared in installments from 1956 to 1975. The Zurich leaves went back to Cairo on 12 October 1975. The affair became the poster case for the publication monopolies that had slowed both Nag Hammadi and Dead Sea Scrolls scholarship, until the International Association for Coptic Studies resolved against exclusive rights in December 1976. The full facsimile edition followed, 1972 to 1984, and in 1977 the English translation finally made texts like the Gospel of Thomas, which opens "These are the secret sayings which the living Jesus spoke", available to general readers.
The documented facts are these: fourth-century papyrus books, found around 1945, routed through the antiquities trade, nationalized, and published after a long fight. Nearly everything else, the lone discoverer, the jinn, the eaten heart, the exact December day, comes from testimony gathered thirty years later with whiskey and ten-pound notes. Pedagogical usefulness, as Goodacre puts it, "is not a barometer of truth". Sometimes history is a little less interesting than legend.
Why someone buried the books at all remains interpretation, and scholars disagree in three directions. Robinson's introduction to the Nag Hammadi Library proposed that the codices came from a nearby Pachomian monastery and were hidden after Athanasius's 367 Festal Letter condemned non-canonical books. Nicola Denzey Lewis and Justine Blount have challenged it, arguing the books may have been commissioned and buried as funerary prestige goods, which would fit a find spot beside an ancient cemetery. Hugo Lundhaug and Lance Jenott defend monastic ownership without the persecution motive: monks may simply have made and read these books. None of the three is documented. The texts themselves are open to anyone, and our own Gnosticism Explained is a good place to start with what they actually say.
Read the book
Related Articles
Continue through articles sharing this topic.
Esoteric literature has a way of swallowing beginners whole. You pick up one book about alchemy, and within a week you have six tabs open about Renaissance…
7 min read
In January 1896 the German scholar Carl Reinhardt bought a Coptic papyrus codex in Cairo.
7 min read
Every few decades, someone translates the esoteric classics again. New Enoches appear. New Pistis Sophias.
6 min read
Pick a shelf of spiritual books at random and you will find, somewhere in the first twenty pages, the same accusation: you are not actually awake.
7 min read
Related Books
Catalog volumes sharing this article’s lead tag.