Xognosis EsotericaArcane Publishing StudioTwo ancient texts describe what happens when the soul tries to leave the world. In one, the soul walks out through a checkpoint, answers a gauntlet of hostile interrogators, and says nothing after the last gate.
Share
Two ancient texts describe what happens when the soul tries to leave the world. In one, the soul walks out through a checkpoint, answers a gauntlet of hostile interrogators, and says nothing after the last gate. In the other, a fallen power cannot get home at all until she has sung thirteen acts of repentance and received mysteries she could never have invented for herself. The Gospel of Mary gives us the ascent as cross-examination. Pistis Sophia gives it as liturgy. Read side by side, they sketch two different answers to the same question: what, exactly, does the soul owe the authorities at the border?
Both texts are fragmentary survivors. The Gospel of Mary exists in three witnesses: two third-century Greek fragments (P.Ryl. 463, published 1938, and P.Oxy. 3525, published 1983) and a longer fifth-century Coptic translation in the Berlin Codex, bought in Cairo in 1896 and published only in 1955. The Coptic copy opens with the flat editorial marker "Pages 1 through 6 are missing," loses "Pages 11 through 14" just before the ascent dialogue that survives, and resumes mid-flight.
Pistis Sophia survives in a single manuscript, the Askew Codex, bought by the London doctor and collector Anthony Askew from a bookseller in the early 1770s and purchased by the British Museum from his heirs in 1785. It is now British Library Add. 5114. Scholars propose a second- or third-century composition date, though the scholarly catalogue e-Clavis notes the composition "lacks homogeneity": it is a compilation rather than one author's book. Proposed dates for the manuscript itself range from the third century to the late fourth.
In the Gospel of Mary, the risen Savior teaches the disciples, departs, and leaves them afraid. Mary Magdalene (most scholars identify her as this Mary) steadies the group by reporting a private vision. In it a soul ascends and is stopped by powers with no right to stop it.
What survives reads like a deposition. The second power, Desire, claims ownership: "I didn't see you going down, but now I see you're going up. So why are you lying, since you belong to me?" The soul's reply is almost contemptuous: "I was to you just a garment, and you didn't recognize me." The third power turns on judgment itself: "Where are you going? In wickedness you're bound. Since you're bound, don't judge!" And the soul answers, "Why do you judge me, since I haven't judged? I was bound, even though I haven't bound."
Then comes the fourth power with its seven forms. In Mark Mattison's public-domain translation, the one used in our own edition of The Gospel of Mary, the forms are named darkness, desire, ignorance, zeal for death, the kingdom of the flesh, the flesh's foolish "wisdom," and the "wisdom" of anger. The powers put the classic border question: "Where do you come from, you murderer, and where are you going, conqueror of space?"
The soul's answer is the text's high point, a summary of liberation rather than an argument: "What binds me has been killed, what surrounds me has been overcome, my desire is gone, and ignorance has died. In a world I was released from a world, and in a type from a type which is above, and from the chain of forgetfulness which exists only for a time." Then it passes through, and the scene closes on a line of deliberate silence: "From now on I'll receive the rest of the time of the season of the age in silence."
Calling this a courtroom is my interpretation, not a consensus scholarly label. What the text itself gives is hostile questioning, a dispute about who has the right to judge, and a soul that talks its way past the powers on its own authority. King's gloss on the scene points the same direction when she describes "the soul set free from the Powers of Matter." The soul wins the crossing alone. Nobody vouches for it. It carries no ticket, no seal, no password handed down from above.
Pistis Sophia stages the opposite arrangement across the long central movement of the book. The story is myth, and should be read as myth: Sophia, a power of the thirteenth aeon, looks down into the chaos below, decides to take light for herself without her pair, and descends. There the "great lion-faced light-power," whom Jesus identifies as Yaldabaōth, "devoured all the light-powers in Sophia and cleaned out her light and devoured it." She is stuck in the dark, crying out to the Light.
Her route home is song. The first repentance opens: "O Light of lights, in whom I have had faith from the beginning, hearken now then, O Light, unto my repentance. Save me, O Light, for evil thoughts have entered into me." It ends as praise: "Now, therefore, O Light, which is in thee and is with me, I sing praises to thy name, O Light, in glory. May my song of praise please thee, O Light, as an excellent mystery, which leadeth to the gates of the Light, which they who shall repent will utter, and the light of which will purify them." Jesus names the genre outright in the next chapter: "This is the song of praise which Pistis Sophia uttered in her first repentance."
The count is explicit in chapter 57 of Mead's numbering: "I have transgressed in the twelve aeons, and have descended from them; wherefor have I uttered the twelve repentances, [one] for each aeon." And then she begins a thirteenth. After each song a disciple interprets it against scripture, the Psalms of David, the Psalms of Solomon, or the Odes of Solomon, so the Hebrew Bible is made to prophesy Sophia's ordeal in advance. (Mead numbers the psalms by the Septuagint; his 68 is Psalm 69 in English Bibles.)
Here, self-authored repentance is still not enough. Chapter 103 states the rule with scholastic bluntness: "Even if a righteous man hath committed no sins at all, he cannot possibly be brought into the Light-kingdom, because the sign of the kingdom of the mysteries is not with him. In a word, it is impossible to bring souls into the Light without the mysteries of the Light-kingdom." The mysteries are given, taught, and sealed. Ascending souls in the outer spaces recite pre-arranged answers, "the answers and the apologies and the tokens," like travelers with papers in order.
The two texts also meet on a smaller stage. In the Gospel of Mary, after Mary finishes teaching, Peter objects: did the Savior really speak with a woman privately rather than openly to them? Are they to turn and listen to her? Levi rebukes him: "If the Savior made her worthy, who are you then to reject her?" In Pistis Sophia, chapter 36 of Mead's numbering, Peter complains in nearly the same register: "My Lord, we will not endure this woman, for she taketh the opportunity from us and hath let none of us speak, but she discourseth many times." The scholar Esther de Boer, as cited in the secondary literature, notes that Peter plays this same role in both texts. Whoever wrote these scenes worked in a world where a woman's authority to teach was a live controversy.
The contrast between the two ascents is the lasting one. One text trusts the soul to answer for itself and lets silence be the reward. The other builds an apparatus of repentance, interpretation, and transmitted mysteries, and even then the soul goes home sealed and sponsored. Together they map the range of ancient Gnostic imagination about grace and self-authority, from the border you talk your way across to the gate that opens only for a password you were given. Our reimagined edition, Pistis Sophia Reimagined, retells the thirteen repentances for the modern reader; the original, like the Gospel of Mary, is worth meeting in plain English first.
The Gospel of Mary's soul passes the powers on its own recognizance and ascends into silence; Pistis Sophia's falls, sings thirteen repentances, and still needs given mysteries to come home. Between the two lies the whole ancient argument about what the soul can do for itself.
Read the book
Related Articles
Continue through articles sharing this topic.
Esoteric literature has a way of swallowing beginners whole. You pick up one book about alchemy, and within a week you have six tabs open about Renaissance…
7 min read
In January 1896 the German scholar Carl Reinhardt bought a Coptic papyrus codex in Cairo.
7 min read
Every few decades, someone translates the esoteric classics again. New Enoches appear. New Pistis Sophias.
6 min read
Pick a shelf of spiritual books at random and you will find, somewhere in the first twenty pages, the same accusation: you are not actually awake.
7 min read
Related Books
Catalog volumes sharing this article’s lead tag.